That is not science, that is scientism. It is far more scientific and rational to choose to do or not do something based on universal properties (what has always been true, what did our ancestors avoid, etc.) than to look upon some clinical evidence and act as though the matter is settled. Is it logical to listen to studies stuck in a 70% replication crisis? A study that uses the most misused and abused technique in all scientific history; linear regression? To treat association on the same level as causality? Leaping from “there is entropy” to “life has no meaning” or “there is no God” is neither scientific nor logical.