Manufactured Surprise
Why Many of Today’s Scientific “Findings” are Obvious
The majority of “findings” coming from today’s science are only “surprising” because science operates inside the outdated reductionist paradigm.
In health, collect even more data, find a “new” pattern, which later turns out to be the same damn thing your ancestors were doing.
Physics…turns out that phenomenon might not be fundamental, but emergent!
Shocker.
All surprises are in juxtaposition to what was expected, because what was (and is) expected are false disconnected, independent causes based on reductionist science, rather than correctly emergent and fully holistic properties that have always been here.
Eventually all studies and data will converge to timeless truths; patterns that have always existed, and that should be obvious to anyone living beyond (and prior to) the “Enlightenment.”
Studies and experimentation cannot be part of tomorrow’s science if it is to become unmoored from its platonic and ultimately wrong beginnings.
Mathematical abstraction and logical argumentation about timeless properties, yes. Highly constrained and sterile studies designed to interpret the obvious using fake causes, no.
These are not “findings” if we continue to manufacture our surprise.
